<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: software quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatmattbone.com/2010/03/software-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatmattbone.com/2010/03/software-quality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://thatmattbone.com/2010/03/software-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 06:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatmattbone.com/?p=194#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>Look at the average development cycle (simplified):

 [HACK][SHIP]

Is there any question why software quality and testing are such a joke?  I think it has to do something with the software process itself being fundamentally broken.

My two favorite examples of brokenness:  unit testing and 6 Sigma Methods.

Unit testing is great, but so many companies use it as their *only* form of testing.  Great, the function worked, but is the output at the end sane?  Well, that is not what this tool is meant for.

6 Sigma Methods.  Ok, this is my Motorola training coming out for this rant.  For the un-brainwashed, sigma is supposed to be a measure of goodness. Where 0 Sigma = pure crap, and 7 sigma = 0 flaws per million.  For some odd reason, 6 Sigma = 3.14 flaws per million, which is close enough to perfect.  Too bad that when it comes to software, 1 flaw per anything means that your program may be totally hosed.  Or more simply put Almost Perfect is a nicer way of saying Not Totally F&#039;ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the average development cycle (simplified):</p>
<p> [HACK][SHIP]</p>
<p>Is there any question why software quality and testing are such a joke?  I think it has to do something with the software process itself being fundamentally broken.</p>
<p>My two favorite examples of brokenness:  unit testing and 6 Sigma Methods.</p>
<p>Unit testing is great, but so many companies use it as their *only* form of testing.  Great, the function worked, but is the output at the end sane?  Well, that is not what this tool is meant for.</p>
<p>6 Sigma Methods.  Ok, this is my Motorola training coming out for this rant.  For the un-brainwashed, sigma is supposed to be a measure of goodness. Where 0 Sigma = pure crap, and 7 sigma = 0 flaws per million.  For some odd reason, 6 Sigma = 3.14 flaws per million, which is close enough to perfect.  Too bad that when it comes to software, 1 flaw per anything means that your program may be totally hosed.  Or more simply put Almost Perfect is a nicer way of saying Not Totally F&#8217;ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

